Thursday, November 19, 2009

NEW YORK JUSTICE

Attorney General Holder declared that one major reason for selection of the Southern New York District to try the Terrorist group that is being brought for trial on US soil is that he is supremely confident in the ability of the combination of Judges, prosecutors, and juries in that district to render a fair trial and gain just convictions.

If these legal personalities and their attendant juries are so reliable, why is it that a known crime syndicate leader by the name of Junior Gotti cannot be found innocent or guilty? I have not read any of the transcripts of his three previous trials, or for that matter, the present one. But it seems strange that the prosecution first three attempts resulted in a "Hung" jury as is the present attempt.

If I were one of those terrorists going on trial, I could not have wished for a better place to be tried unless it were Iran, Palestine, or maybe the Hague. I wonder when these folks will be unconditionally released and sent back to their own little corner of the world where they can resume their prior jobs; namely killing Americans.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

TV TRIALS

Drama portrayed on TV often seems to be misleading. The long running show Law and Order generally allows the prosecution to "win" its case while, at the same time, showing a rather disturbing aspect of US justice and rules.

There have been multiple instances in which a defendant has subverted the law because of very dubious technicalities; The search warrant was ruled invalid because it did not specify everything that was taken, the criminal was not "properly" told his rights even though the spirit and intent of the requirement had been observed, the police was shown to have prejudices that caused their actions to be questioned thus invalidating key evidence items, defense lawyers who are able to "pick" sympathetic juries or present non legal based defenses, and the list goes on.

Other examples of disconnected or questionable justice decisions stems from the portrayal of people who claim military or "terrorist" sympathies.

We in the US are soon to be faced with real life examples of admitted anti US individuals who, in some cases, have admitted (forget the so called "waterboarding" torture claims) to performing heinous crimes against the US and its people for the purpose of destroying the US being tried in Federal courts and not by Military tribunals. These people being tried have a very good chance of being found either "not guilty" or of being convicted of lesser charges. And, their expected and in my mind, deserved punishment could be much less than desired.

This result is, in my opinion, based solely on POLITICAL considerations and not on the need to deliver a strong rebuke to the enemies of the US. It is my opinion that our Government is wrong and needs to change. It should be noted that the problem , as I see it, is not related to any one political party, but towards the general inability of the government over the last 30 years from providing real protection for its citizens; Although, it seems to be more apparent with the present Administration than with previous ones.

Monday, November 16, 2009

GOVERNMENT HELP

The following was sent to me partly as a joke but, in reality, as a lesson in OUR stupidity.

Once upon a time the government had a vast scrap yard in the middle of a desert. Congress said, "Someone may steal from it at night." So they created a night watchman position and hired a person for the job.

Then Congress said, "How does the watchman do his job without instruction?" So they created a planning department and hired two people, one person to write the instructions, and one person to do time studies.

Then Congress said, "How will we know the night watchman is doing the tasks correctly?" So they created a Quality Control department and hired two people. One to do the studies and one to write the reports.

Then Congress said, "How are these people going to get paid?" So They created the following positions, a time keeper, and a payroll officer, Then hired two people.

Then Congress said, "Who will be accountable for all of these people?" So they created an administrative section and hired three people, an Administrative Officer, Assistant Administrative Officer, and a Legal Secretary.

Then Congress said, "We have had this command in operation for one year and we are $18,000 over budget, we must cutback overall cost."

So they laid off the night watchman!!

Does anybody remember the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY during the Carter Administration?

We've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember! It was very simple and at the time, everybody thought it very appropriate. The Department of Energy was instituted on 8-04-1977.

TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL!

AND NOW, IT'S 2009 -- 32 YEARS LATER -- AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS "NECESSARY" DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR.

THEY HAVE 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES; AND LOOK AT THE JOB THEY HAVE DONE!

good ole bureaucracy.

AND, NOW, WE ARE GOING TO TURN THE BANKING SYSTEM, HEALTH CARE AND THE AUTO INDUSTRY OVER TO THE SAME GOVERNMENT?

This insanity must stop.. NOW.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

MOVIES

In honor of Armistice/Veterans Day I thought it would be nice to list some of my favorite war and war related movies. It could be argued that some of these are not strictly war related but really other themes. Most relate to US wars although some refer to other conflits, and in at least two cases, only to hypothetical conflicts.

12 0'clock High
All Quiet on the Western Front
Blood on the Sun
Caine Mutiny
Das Boot
Destination Tokyo
Farewell to Arms
Fighting 69th
Final Countdown
Flags of our Fathers
Flying Tigers
Four Feathers
From Here to Eternity
Gettysburg
Glory
Great Escape
Green Barets
Guadalcanal Diary
Gunga Din
Heartbreak Ridge
Hunt for Red October
In Harms Way
Last of the Mohicans
Letters from Iwo Jima
Lighthorsemen
MacArthur
Midway
Mr Roberts
On the Beach
Patriot
Patton
Run Silent Run Deep
Sand Pebbles
Sands of Iwo Jima
Saving Private Ryan
Seven days in May
Sgt York
They died with their Boots on
They Were Expendable
To Hell and Back
Tora Tora Tora
Up Periscope
Wake Island
Walk in the Sun
We Were Soldiers
Zulu

Comments or your list?

Sunday, November 08, 2009

WHAT A DIFFERENCE

A tragic series of events occurred at our military base at Ft Hood, Texas. A, most likely, deranged individual was able to (allegedly) kill at least 13 people and wound another 27. Most of these people were Military members waiting to be deployed overseas. The suspected shooter, a medical officer is still alive and will probably recover.

Shortly after the evens occurred, ex President G. Bush, without news coverage or fanfare, showed up at Ft Hood to provide comfort and care for the fallen and wounded. He was able to stay for about 2 hours while insisting there should be no press coverage for his presence. Seems to me he really cared, and still does, for the military and their families.

Meanwhile, President Obama provided, as an afterthought for a well conducted Indian conference, acknowledgement that some military people were killed at Ft Hood by someone. He then visited the Military hospital where the Suspect had been last stationed. (?). I have heard that he plans on visiting at Ft Hood sooner or later when proper arrangements may be made. Which means he probably has to be assured that the teleprompter works OK, Security is sufficiently tight, and he can work around his many very important task assignments.

Anyone with any sense of propriety should be able to see the difference between the former President and the present office holder. One is a true leader while the other only considers himself first.

Do you wonder about Obama? I would definitely not wish to be placed in harm's way with the present administration in charge. Even LBJ was better than this!

Friday, November 06, 2009

MORE OF THE SAME

The President really must be having a difficult time making decisions. Maybe he should ignore everything that is going on around him and just go play a game of golf, or basketball.

He can't decide whether to send additional troops to the war zone, how to close the Guantanamo prison, whether to congratulate the Indian discussions or grieve for the dead at Ft Hood, decide what the proximate cause of the Ft Hood killing spree by the Muslim Officer may have been, how to get the so called health care legislation off dead center, how to get the Israelis to do his bidding, whether he ignored or followed the election results, and any other number of things that are not working.

I heard that he is quite good at basketball.

Maybe he needs the wise counsel of his pastor Rev Wright after all.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

WHAT 'S GOING ON??

Since May, both houses of Congress have wrapped themselves around one bit of legislation, namely, Healthcare Overhaul. Specifically, it appears that the Federal Government is attempting to gain control of all health care business in the country no matter what the impact or desires of the citizens may be.

Most of these efforts by Congress have been an exercise in futility even though one party controls all of Congress. Fortunately for US Citizens, there are still some Democratic politicians who understand that their primary responsibility is to vote for the best interests of their home constituency and not just stamp approval when told to do so.

What I do not understand is what else is happening to occupy the time of these various 535 (approximately) politicians over the last 6 months? Where are their energies being directed? what else is coming along that may be just as disastrous for the citizens? Hopefully, I am wrong and they really have been wasting all this time due to inefficiency. The point also to be considered is that apparently, the real Health Bill or various Health Bills have yet to be written.